Recently, someone asked me about joining two independent clauses to make a compound sentence. She thought such a sentence would need a comma, but she often found them missing. Today, we’ll review how to join independent clauses.
First, a couple of definitions. A clause is a part of a sentence that contains a subject and a verb; it may or may not contain other words. An independent clause can stand as a sentence on its own because it contains a complete thought:
I ran.
Alternatively, a dependent clause does not contain a complete thought and can’t stand on its own:
Although I was hungry
A compound sentence is two or more independent clauses (sentences) joined together:
President Obama and Korean President Lee failed to reach agreement on the Korean Free Trade Agreement (FTA) before a joint press conference in Seoul Thursday, but both leaders said the two sides will continue to work towards a final consensus in the near future.
What punctuation do you use between two independent clauses? You have a few options, depending on what parts of speech you use to join the sentences.
- Coordinating conjunctions. If you use one of the coordinating conjunctions–and, but, for, nor, or, so, or yet–to join two independent clauses, use a comma before the conjunction:
Swift action saves a man’s life, but paramedics fear electric-shock victim may have suffered internal burns to organs.
- Adverbs. If you use an adverb, such as however, nevertheless, or thus, use a semicolon before the adverb and a comma after:
We expect average subscription prices to stay around current levels in the near term; however, if promotional activities continue longer than expected or new content agreements adversely impact Dish, this could lower our price estimate of $25.84.
Note, however, that if you use therefore or thus and you don’t need to emphasize the following clause, you can drop the comma:
The plane took off late due to poor weather conditions; thus we arrived late.
- Transition expression. If you use a phrase such as for example, similarly, or namely, use a semicolon before the adverb and a comma after:
After 45 days of no rain, the farmers were worried about their crops; indeed, it was all they thought about.
- Just punctuation. You might choose to join your independent clauses with just punctuation; in that case, use a semicolon (as this sentence does), a colon, or an em-dash.
In The Copyeditor’s Handbook, Amy Einsohn succinctly lays out the rules (IND stands for independent clause):
IND, coordinate conjunction IND.
IND; adverb [,] IND.
IND; transitional expression, IND.
IND; IND. or IND: IND. or IND–IND.
For a deeper explanation and more examples, check out pages 78-79 of Einsohn’s book.
Do you have more questions on joining clauses? Email me or leave a comment below.

Latest Tweets

The plane took off late due to poor weather conditions; thus we arrived late.
Shouldn’t it be ‘owing to’?
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Erin Brenner, Erin Brenner. Erin Brenner said: A lot of compound sentences are being joined without proper punctuation. Here's a brief rundown of how to do it right. http://bit.ly/dk0RNo [...]
Alternately, a dependent clause(?) not contain a complete thought and can’t (sand) on its own.
Should have been
Alternately, a dependent clause does not contain a complete thought and can’t stand on its own.
Again, is it not ‘alternatively’?
Rao, thank you for catching my errors. I’ve corrected the sentence in the post.
Owing to and due to can both be used to mean because of.
It’s all right, Erin. Sorry for nitpicking. I’m glad you took my correction in the professional spirit.
Yes, the distinction between ‘owing to’ and ‘due to’ is long dead. Only strict grammarians gnash their teeth at the wrong usage.
Thanks for your comments, Robin. Due to is one of those phrases that cause trouble wherever they go.
True, due to means “attributable to,” but it also means “because of.” This second definition has been around since 1897, according to Oxford Dictionaries Online and has been a bone of contention since then. Bryan A. Garner calls due to a skunked term in Garner’s Modern American Usage,: a term whose meaning changes greatly and becomes the object of dispute. One side only allows for the traditional meaning, while the other side embrace the new meaning. That other side includes not only language liberals but also speakers who don’t think much about language. In the end, says Garner, the first group tends to shrink over time while the second group grows. While the debate rages on, however, the skunked term causes numerous debates and probably should be avoided in some cases (“due to” and “Skunked Terms”).
I tend to be more of a descriptivist, but when I edit I think about the context and audience. I’d reconsider allowing due to and other skunked terms in certain texts.
[...] to” to you, or can it also mean “because of”? My recent blog post on joining independent clauses started a discussion about the proper use of due to, which appeared in an example sentence and was [...]