<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Resources</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thewritingresource.net/language-resources/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thewritingresource.net</link>
	<description>Bite-Sized Lessons to Improve Your Writing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 10:00:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Farhan Syed</title>
		<link>http://thewritingresource.net/language-resources/comment-page-1/#comment-3573</link>
		<dc:creator>Farhan Syed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 21:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewritingresource.net/?page_id=272#comment-3573</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much for replying. It helped a lot. But may I trouble you with a few more questions? 

1) I live in India and the school to which I went didn&#039;t teach us much grammar. Our teachers taught the English language by making us read a lot of quality English prose and poetry, but no grammar.  Now, I&#039;m working on a novel and I want no mistakes to crop in. So I want to read a grammar book, which teaches British grammar in simple English. Could you please make a suggestion? 


2) Professor Lynch says that; &quot;There ain&#039;t a rule in the language what can&#039;t be broke.&quot; 
- http://andromeda.rutgers.edu/~jlynch/Writing/r.html#rules

So if all the rules of grammar can be broken and will still be considered as correct English, then what is the use of learning grammar rules? Shouldn&#039;t it suffice if a person (like me) has only a working knowledge of English? 

3) From the few pages available for viewing on Amazon, I liked &#039;The Grammar Devotional&#039; very much but alas it is written by an American. Do you think that the said book, or any other good American English book can help us in any way who follow the British English?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much for replying. It helped a lot. But may I trouble you with a few more questions? </p>
<p>1) I live in India and the school to which I went didn&#8217;t teach us much grammar. Our teachers taught the English language by making us read a lot of quality English prose and poetry, but no grammar.  Now, I&#8217;m working on a novel and I want no mistakes to crop in. So I want to read a grammar book, which teaches British grammar in simple English. Could you please make a suggestion? </p>
<p>2) Professor Lynch says that; &#8220;There ain&#8217;t a rule in the language what can&#8217;t be broke.&#8221;<br />
- <a href="http://andromeda.rutgers.edu/~jlynch/Writing/r.html#rules" rel="nofollow">http://andromeda.rutgers.edu/~jlynch/Writing/r.html#rules</a></p>
<p>So if all the rules of grammar can be broken and will still be considered as correct English, then what is the use of learning grammar rules? Shouldn&#8217;t it suffice if a person (like me) has only a working knowledge of English? </p>
<p>3) From the few pages available for viewing on Amazon, I liked &#8216;The Grammar Devotional&#8217; very much but alas it is written by an American. Do you think that the said book, or any other good American English book can help us in any way who follow the British English?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erin Brenner</title>
		<link>http://thewritingresource.net/language-resources/comment-page-1/#comment-3572</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin Brenner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 19:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewritingresource.net/?page_id=272#comment-3572</guid>
		<description>Farhan, most of the resources on this page are for American English. Oxford publishes both British English and American English dictionaries. Good dictionary choices for British English include the &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0199561052/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_il_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=thewritreso-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0199561052&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Concise Oxford English Dictionary&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;, the &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0007321198/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_il_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=thewritreso-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0007321198&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Collins English Dictionary&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;, and &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1405025263/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_il_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=thewritreso-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=1405025263&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Macmillan English Dictionary&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;.

&lt;em&gt;The Chicago Manual of Style&lt;/em&gt; is an American stylebook, though it could be adapted for British English use (a big drawback would be the punctuation rules would vary quite a bit). So, yes, &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0198605641/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_il_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=thewritreso-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0198605641&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Oxford Style Manual&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0198610416/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_il_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=thewritreso-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0198610416&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The New Hart&#039;s Rules&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt; would be better choices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Farhan, most of the resources on this page are for American English. Oxford publishes both British English and American English dictionaries. Good dictionary choices for British English include the <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0199561052/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_il_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=thewritreso-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0199561052" rel="nofollow">Concise Oxford English Dictionary</a></em>, the <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0007321198/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_il_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=thewritreso-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0007321198" rel="nofollow">Collins English Dictionary</a></em>, and <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1405025263/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_il_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=thewritreso-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=1405025263" rel="nofollow">Macmillan English Dictionary</a></em>.</p>
<p><em>The Chicago Manual of Style</em> is an American stylebook, though it could be adapted for British English use (a big drawback would be the punctuation rules would vary quite a bit). So, yes, <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0198605641/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_il_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=thewritreso-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0198605641" rel="nofollow">The Oxford Style Manual</a></em> and <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0198610416/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_il_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=thewritreso-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0198610416" rel="nofollow">The New Hart&#8217;s Rules</a></em> would be better choices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Farhan Syed</title>
		<link>http://thewritingresource.net/language-resources/comment-page-1/#comment-3571</link>
		<dc:creator>Farhan Syed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 08:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewritingresource.net/?page_id=272#comment-3571</guid>
		<description>Hi Ms. Brenner.

I follow the British English. Are these books valid equally for the Americans and the Britishers? 

I mean I have heard people say that the Oxford dictionary is for the Britishers and Webster is for the Americans. But I have observed in both these dictionaries that they contain both American and British spellings whenever there is a discrepancy.  So I&#039;m a bit confused. 

Similarly people say that &#039;The Chicago Manual of Style&#039; is for the Americans and Britishers should follow something like the &#039;Oxford Manual of Style&#039; or &#039;Hart&#039;s Rules&#039;.  Are such statements true? Could you please explain?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ms. Brenner.</p>
<p>I follow the British English. Are these books valid equally for the Americans and the Britishers? </p>
<p>I mean I have heard people say that the Oxford dictionary is for the Britishers and Webster is for the Americans. But I have observed in both these dictionaries that they contain both American and British spellings whenever there is a discrepancy.  So I&#8217;m a bit confused. </p>
<p>Similarly people say that &#8216;The Chicago Manual of Style&#8217; is for the Americans and Britishers should follow something like the &#8216;Oxford Manual of Style&#8217; or &#8216;Hart&#8217;s Rules&#8217;.  Are such statements true? Could you please explain?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Favorite Language Resources</title>
		<link>http://thewritingresource.net/language-resources/comment-page-1/#comment-2142</link>
		<dc:creator>My Favorite Language Resources</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewritingresource.net/?page_id=272#comment-2142</guid>
		<description>[...] Language Resources [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Language Resources [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Grammar Devotional: Learn Something New Today</title>
		<link>http://thewritingresource.net/language-resources/comment-page-1/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>The Grammar Devotional: Learn Something New Today</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 13:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewritingresource.net/?page_id=272#comment-119</guid>
		<description>[...] Language Resources [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Language Resources [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erin Brenner</title>
		<link>http://thewritingresource.net/language-resources/comment-page-1/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin Brenner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewritingresource.net/?page_id=272#comment-82</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Jim. Please let me know what else you might be looking for from my blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Jim. Please let me know what else you might be looking for from my blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Sanders</title>
		<link>http://thewritingresource.net/language-resources/comment-page-1/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Sanders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewritingresource.net/?page_id=272#comment-77</guid>
		<description>I just discovered you. Thank you so much for your work.
Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just discovered you. Thank you so much for your work.<br />
Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Language Resources Page</title>
		<link>http://thewritingresource.net/language-resources/comment-page-1/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Language Resources Page</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 13:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewritingresource.net/?page_id=272#comment-58</guid>
		<description>[...] Language Resources [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Language Resources [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

